Category Archives: Abstracts

The role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and training in patients with pulmonary hypertension: making the case for this assessment and intervention to be considered a standard of care.

Sabbahi A; Severin R; Ozemek C; Phillips SA; Arena R;

Expert Review Of Respiratory Medicine [Expert Rev Respir Med] 2020 Jan 03, pp. 1-11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 03.

Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a broad pathophysiological disorder primarily characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance due to multiple possible etiologies. Patients typically present with multiple complaints that worsen as disease severity increases. Although initially discouraged due to safety concerns, exercise interventions for patients with PH have gained wide interest and multiple investigations have established the effective role of exercise training in improving the clinical profile, exercise tolerance, and overall quality of life.Areas covered: In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of PH during rest and exercise, the role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) in the diagnosis and prognosis of PAH, the role of exercise interventions in this patient population, and the expected physiological adaptations to exercise training.Expert opinion: Exercise testing, in particular CPX, provides a wealth of clinically valuable information in the PH population. Moreover, the available evidence strongly supports the safety and efficacy of exercise training as a clinical tool in improving exercise tolerance and quality of life. Although clinical trials investigating the role of exercise in this PH population are relatively few compared to other chronic conditions, current available evidence supports the clinical implementation of exercise training as a safe and effective treatment modality.

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Provides Additional Prognostic Information in Cystic Fibrosis.

Hebestreit H; Hulzebos EHJ; Schneiderman JE; Karila C; Boas SR; Kriemler
S; Dwyer T; Sahlberg M; Urquhart DS; Lands LC; Ratjen F; Takken T;Varanistkaya L; Rucker V; Hebestreit A;
Usemann J; Radtke T; PrognosticValue of CPET in CF Study Group.

American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 199(8):987-995,
2019 04 15.

RATIONALE: The prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)
for survival in cystic fibrosis (CF) in the context of current clinical
management, when controlling for other known prognostic factors, is
unclear.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prognostic value of CPET-derived measures
beyond peak oxygen uptake ( V. o2peak) following rigorous adjustment for
other predictors.

METHODS: Data from 10 CF centers in Australia, Europe, and North America
were collected retrospectively. A total of 510 patients completed a cycle
CPET between January 2000 and December 2007, of which 433 fulfilled the
criteria for a maximal effort. Time to death/lung transplantation was
analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. In addition,
phenotyping using hierarchical Ward clustering was performed to
characterize high-risk subgroups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cox regression showed, even after
adjustment for sex, FEV1% predicted, body mass index (z-score), age at
CPET, Pseudomonas aeruginosa status, and CF-related diabetes as covariates
in the model, that V. o2peak in % predicted (hazard ratio [HR], 0.964; 95%
confidence interval [CI], 0.944-0.986), peak work rate (% predicted; HR,
0.969; 95% CI, 0.951-0.988), ventilatory equivalent for oxygen (HR, 1.085;
95% CI, 1.041-1.132), and carbon dioxide (HR, 1.060; 95% CI, 1.007-1.115)
(all P < 0.05) were significant predictors of death or lung
transplantation at 10-year follow-up. Phenotyping revealed that
CPET-derived measures were important for clustering. We identified a
high-risk cluster characterized by poor lung function, nutritional status,
and exercise capacity.

CONCLUSIONS: CPET provides additional prognostic information to
established predictors of death/lung transplantation in CF. High-risk
patients may especially benefit from regular monitoring of exercise
capacity and exercise counseling.

Moderate-intensity continuous exercise is superior to high-intensity interval training in the proportion of VO2peak responders after ACS.

Trachsel LD; Nigam A; Fortier A; Lalongé J; Juneau M; Gayda M;

Revista Espanola De Cardiologia (English Ed.) [Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)] 2019 Dec 11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 11.

Introduction and Objectives: We compared the effects of 12 weeks of low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) vs moderate-intensity continuous exercise training (MICET) on cardiopulmonary exercise test parameters and the proportion of non/low responders (NLR) to exercise training in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.
Methods: Patients with a recent ACS were randomized to LV-HIIT, MICET, or a usual care group. LV-HIIT consisted of 2 to 3 sets of 6 to 10minutes with repeated bouts of 15 to 30seconds at 100% of peak workload alternating with 15 to 30seconds of passive recovery. Cardiopulmonary exercise test parameters were assessed, and key exercise variables were calculated. Training response was assessed according to the median VO2peak change post vs pretraining in the whole cohort (stratification NLR vs high response).
Results: Fifty patients were included in the analysis (LV-HIIT, n=23; MICET, n=18; usual care, n=9) and 74% were male. The proportion of NLR was higher in the LV-HIIT group than in the MICET group (LV-HIIT 61%, MICET 21%, and usual care 80%; P=.0040). VO2peak-dependent variables (VO2peak, percent-predicted VO2peak) improved in both training groups (P=.002 and P <.0001 for time with LV-HIIT and MICET, respectively), but the improvement was more pronounced with MICET (P=.004 and P=.001 for interaction, respectively). The ΔVO2/Δworkload slope improved only with MICET (P=.021).
Conclusions: In patients with a recent ACS, several prognostic VO2peak-dependent variables were improved after LV-HIIT, but the improvement was more pronounced or only found after MICET. Low-volume HIIT resulted in a higher proportion of NLR than isocaloric MICET. Clinical trialsregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifiers: NCT03414996 and NCT02048696).

Identifying poor cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight and obese children and adolescents by using heart rate variability analysis under resting conditions.

Redón P; Grassi G; Redon J; Álvarez-Pitti J; Lurbe E;

Blood Pressure [Blood Press] 2019 Dec 12, pp. 1-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 12.

Background: Childhood obesity, including overweight, continues increasing worldwide affecting health expectancy, quality of life and healthcare expenditure. These subjects have higher probability of suffering or developing cardio metabolic risk factors. Recent studies have revealed cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) as a valuable clinical parameter to identify these subjects and have even suggested cut-off values. However, evaluating CRF in overweight and obese youth can be difficult to implement, unfriendly and expensive.
Objective: Develop a screening tool to identify high-risk subjects in a representative population of those attending overweight/obesity assessment programmes without prior intervention. It will be based on heart rate variability parameters, which has strong association with CRF and cardio metabolic risk factors.
Methods: Sixty-three subjects, overweight and obese, between 9 and 17 years of age, and of both sexes were enrolled. None of them had secondary obesity syndromes and/or suffered from acute or chronic disease. Anthropometric parameters, electrocardiogram signal recording under resting conditions and cardiorespiratory fitness – evaluated by oxygen consumption and time elapsed of cardiopulmonary exercise test – were measured.
Results: Significant differences in the sympathetic nervous system activity – assessed by heart rate variability analysis – are observed when grouping by overweight and obesity degree as well as by CRF (poor/normal). Body mass index, puberty and sympathetic nervous system activity are the significant variables of a logistic regression model develop to identify poor CRF individuals. Its accuracy reaches 92%.
Conclusions: A screening tool based on heart rate variability and anthropometric parameters was developed to identify subjects with higher probability of suffering or developing cardio metabolic risk factors.

The role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and training in patients with pulmonary hypertension: making the case for this assessment and intervention to be considered a standard of care.

Sabbahi A; Severin R; Ozemek C; Phillips SA; Arena R;

Expert Review Of Respiratory Medicine [Expert Rev Respir Med] 2020 Jan 03, pp. 1-11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 03.

Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a broad pathophysiological disorder primarily characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance due to multiple possible etiologies. Patients typically present with multiple complaints that worsen as disease severity increases. Although initially discouraged due to safety concerns, exercise interventions for patients with PH have gained wide interest and multiple investigations have established the effective role of exercise training in improving the clinical profile, exercise tolerance, and overall quality of life.Areas covered: In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of PH during rest and exercise, the role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) in the diagnosis and prognosis of PAH, the role of exercise interventions in this patient population, and the expected physiological adaptations to exercise training.Expert opinion: Exercise testing, in particular CPX, provides a wealth of clinically valuable information in the PH population. Moreover, the available evidence strongly supports the safety and efficacy of exercise training as a clinical tool in improving exercise tolerance and quality of life. Although clinical trials investigating the role of exercise in this PH population are relatively few compared to other chronic conditions, current available evidence supports the clinical implementation of exercise training as a safe and effective treatment modality.

An update on pulmonary rehabilitation techniques for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Wouters EF; Posthuma R; Koopman M; Liu WY; Sillen MJ; Hajian B; Sastry M; Spruit M;Franssen FM;

Expert Review Of Respiratory Medicine [Expert Rev Respir Med] 2020 Jan 14, pp. 1-13. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 14.

Introduction: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is one of the core components in the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In order to achieve the maximal level of independence, autonomy, and functioning of the patient, targeted therapies and interventions based on the identification of physical, emotional and social traits need to be provided by a dedicated, interdisciplinary PR team.Areas covered: The review discusses cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the selection of different modes of training modalities. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation as well as gait assessment and training are discussed as well as add-on therapies as oxygen, noninvasive ventilator support or endoscopic lung volume reduction in selected patients. The potentials of pulsed inhaled nitric oxide in patients with underlying pulmonary hypertension is explored as well as nutritional support. The impact of sleep quality on outcomes of PR is reviewed.Expert opinion: Individualized, comprehensive intervention based on thorough assessment of physical, emotional, and social traits in COPD patients forms a continuous challenge for health-care professionals and PR organizations in order to dynamically implement and adapt these strategies based on dynamic, more optimal understanding of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Cardiorespiratory fitness in long-term juvenile dermatomyositis: a controlled, cross-sectional study of active/inactive disease.

Berntsen KS; Edvardsen E; Hansen BH; Flato B; Sjaastad I; Sanner H.

Rheumatology. 58(3):492-501, 2019 03 01.

OBJECTIVES: To compare cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) expressed as
maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) between patients with long-term JDM and
controls and between patients with active and inactive disease, as well as
to explore exercise limiting factors and associations between CRF and
disease variables.

METHODS: JDM patients (n = 45) and age- and gender-matched controls (n =
45) performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a treadmill until
exhaustion. Physical activity was measured by accelerometers. Disease
activity, damage and muscle strength/function were assessed by validated
tools. Clinically inactive disease was defined according to PRINTO
criteria.

RESULTS: The mean disease duration was 20.8 (s.d. 11.9) years and 29/45
(64%) patients had inactive disease. A low VO2max was found in 27% of
patients vs 4% of controls (P = 0.006). The mean VO2max and maximal
ventilation (VEmax) were lower in patients with active and inactive
disease compared with controls. Patients with active disease also had
lower maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) compared with controls and lower
VEmax and MVV compared with those with inactive disease. Patients with
inactive disease had lower physical activity levels compared with
controls. VO2max correlated negatively with disease damage in patients
with inactive disease and positively with muscle strength/function in
patients with active disease.

CONCLUSION: CRF was lower in JDM patients, both with active and inactive
disease, compared with controls after a mean 20 years disease duration.
Cardiopulmonary exercise test results suggested different limiting factors
contributing to the reduced CRF according to disease activity, including
deconditioning in inactive disease and reduced ventilatory capacity in
active disease. Further research is needed to verify this.

Aerobic capacity attainment and reasons for cardiopulmonary exercise test termination in people with cancer: a descriptive, retrospective analysis from a single laboratory.

Santa Mina D, Au D, Papadopoulos E, O’Neill M, Diniz C, Dolan L, Lipton J, Chang E, Jones JM.

2020 Jan 4. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05094-4. [Epub ahead of print]

PURPOSE:

Aerobic exercise prescriptions in clinical populations commonly involve target intensities based on cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET). CPETs are often discontinued prior to a patient achieving true maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) which can adversely affect exercise dose and efficacy monitoring; however, reasons for early discontinuation are poorly reported. Accordingly, we explored the CPET termination reasons in persons with cancer participating in exercise intervention studies.

METHODS:

This study comprised of an exploratory, descriptive analysis of retrospective CPET data (VO2 and anaerobic threshold) and termination reasons in a convenience sample of people with cancer participating in exercise intervention studies in a single laboratory. CPETs were standardized using the modified Bruce treadmill protocol with expired gas collection and analysis using a metabolic cart. VO2 max was considered “met” when participants demonstrated (a) oxygen consumption plateau or (b) two of the following criteria: rating of perceived exertion ≥ 9/10, respiratory exchange ratio ≥ 1.15, and/or heart rate of 95% of age-predicted maximum. The frequency and distribution of reasons for test termination relative to the number of CPET exposures for the participants were reported.

RESULTS:

Forty-four participants engaged in exercise studies between February 2016 and March 2018 provided data for the analysis. Participants completed up to three CPETs during this period (total of 78 CPETs in the current analysis). Eighty-six percent of all CPETs were terminated prior to achieving VO2 max verification criteria and no tests resulted in an oxygen consumption plateau. For those that did not demonstrate achievement of VO2 max verification criteria, reasons for discontinuation were distributed as follows: equipment discomfort-49%, volitional peak-36%, and physical discomfort-14.9%. For those who met VO2 max criteria, volitional peak was the most common reason for test termination (45.5%), followed by physical discomfort (36.4%), and equipment discomfort (18.2%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In our sample of cancer survivors, VO2 max criteria were infrequently met with equipment discomfort being a primary reason for participant-driven test termination. Protocol and equipment considerations are necessary for interpretation and application of CPET findings in clinical practice.